COVID-19

COVID-19 pandemic shows we must reduce our blind spots to risk

Judie Shape, 81, who tested positive for coronavirus, acknowledges press photographers gathered outside as her daughter Lori Spencer and husband Michael Spencer visit outside her room at Care Center of Kirkland, the Seattle-area nursing home which is one of the epicenters of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, in Kirkland, Washington, U.S. March 17, 2020.  REUTERS/Jason Redmond - RC20MF94JE97

Judie Shape, 81, who tested positive for coronavirus, receives a visit from her daughter Lori Spencer and husband Michael Spencer in Kirkland, Washington. Image: REUTERS/Jason Redmond

Børge Brende
President, World Economic Forum
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on COVID-19?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how COVID-19 is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

COVID-19

  • The risk of a global pandemic has risen in recent years, but the perception of that risk has not matched reality.
  • We must be aware of our blind spots and position the world to be ready to react to risks as they occur.

We may not have been able to predict the exact details of the COVID-19 pandemic, but we’ve known for years that the risks of global pandemics has been increasing, with the potential for major disruptions across the global economy.

So why does it seem as if this crisis rose out of nowhere, and what can we do about being better prepared for risks in the future?

Discover

What is the World Economic Forum doing about the coronavirus outbreak?

Individuals often identify risks that are readily perceptible – whether because of personal exposure, media coverage, or both – as the most threatening. Those risks not directly ahead tend to go unnoticed.

Data from the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Perception Survey of approximately 1,000 stakeholders have shown this. In the past decade, infectious diseases ranked among the top five perceived risks only once, in 2015, in the direct aftermath of the Ebola epidemic, when it ranked as second highest, in terms of impact.

Even though the survey asks stakeholders to try to think through a 10-year lens, the following year, infectious disease no longer ranked among top risks. Instead, what our survey showed was that beginning in 2016, climate-related issues started to dominate the risks perception of our respondents. It is no coincidence that that year was the warmest on record.

Perceptions of global risks over the next 10 years, according to multistakeholders
Perceptions of global risks over the next 10 years, according to multistakeholders Image: Image: World Economic Forum Global Risks Report 2020

It is human nature to feel most threatened by what feels closest. But a potential danger is that when a risk gets crowded out of our collective sightlines, it may go unaddressed, and we may be ill-prepared to address it when it does manifest.

What can we do?

To begin with, we should be aware of our blind spots. Even as there has rightly been a rise in concern about climate change in many countries in recent years, we should not fail to consider that other risks still linger. Similarly, as the world’s attention now shifts to the outbreak of COVID-19, the global community cannot allow itself to stop fighting for more ambitious action on climate change, or for solutions to challenges around cybersecurity and international security, for that matter.

Have you read?

Already, in the face of the coronavirus pandemic, we have seen important climate summits cancelled, such as the World Oceans Summit in Japan, and difficulty in rescheduling the Convention on Biological Diversity. While we do need to account for new dangers and do need to address the pandemic, it is important that we do not cease the important work of marshalling the global community in raising ambition on climate action.

At the same time, we should pursue measures that make collective blind spots less likely to occur. Here, a strong global multi-stakeholder framework—one in which governments, businesses, and international organizations work in concert—is fundamental. Since diverse actors have diverse perspectives and tend to have diverse touchpoints across societies. Ensuring that a variety of actors across geographies and industries are continually communicating offers a greater possibility that risks that have moved off the direct sightlines of one party are still accounted for collectively.

But, let’s be clear, it is impossible to foresee and be on constant guard for every potential risk around us.

COVID-19 Transformation Map
COVID-19 Transformation Map Image: World Economic Forum

Therefore, we should position ourselves to be ready to address risks that do materialize. Here, again, a multi-stakeholder framework is critical. One only has to look back to 2009 to see the importance that an at-the-ready multilateral framework had in moving the global economy toward recovery. The G20, for instance, by being in a position to quickly bring governments together, was able to release the “Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth” that helped stave off a global depression.

At a time when the coronavirus is dominating our attention, a strong multi-stakeholder approach—through international organizations and global initiatives—is crucial for building resiliency and preparing for upcoming economic, political, and social consequences. But perhaps as important, it is also crucial for ensuring we are in a resilient position regarding the risks not directly in front of us at this moment.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
COVID-19Global Health
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Winding down COVAX – lessons learnt from delivering 2 billion COVID-19 vaccinations to lower-income countries

Charlotte Edmond

January 8, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum