Climate Action

Emissions have fallen this year. Now we need to make it permanent

Steam rises out of chimneys at the Big Bend Power Station owned and operated by Tech Energy in Apollo Beach, Florida U.S.,  August 14, 2019

The pandemic by itself is unlikely to shift the trajectory on climate change Image: REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Charlotta Groth
Global Macroeconomist, Managing Director, Zurich Insurance Group
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Climate Action?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how The Great Reset is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

The Net Zero Transition

  • The pandemic is projected to lead to a fall of 8% in global emissions in 2020.
  • We need to achieve this annually for the next 15 years to meet the Paris Agreement's 1.5˚C goal.
  • While the drop is welcome, a path to sustainable reductions is – as yet – missing.

The green lining of the COVID-19 crisis is a projected 8% drop in global CO2 emissions in 2020. Unfortunately, this barely takes emissions back to where they were a decade ago, and the true eyeopener is that the 8% fall only matches the pace of decline needed every year until 2050 to limit the rise in global temperatures to 1.5°C (which would be in line with the Paris Agreement).

The 8% decline has moreover come alongside the deepest recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s. This unprecedented experience shows that the only way to realistically tackle climate change is to decouple CO2 emissions from economic activity. While possible, this requires very large and transformative investments – in new technology, in the electricity grid, in energy storage capacity, and in large-scale energy efficiency measures. Here, the COVID-19 crisis ought to act as a trigger, as economic support measures could be used to launch green investment projects and reposition the global economy for a greener future.

Have you read?

The pandemic has prompted an unprecedented wave of stimulus. Fiscal support announced since January amounts to $5 trillion, and central banks have injected more than $6 trillion into financial markets. While profound, these emergency steps have certainly not been green, and there are fears that the COVID-19 recovery will be a missed opportunity to shift the trajectory on climate change. This is what happened after the financial crisis of 2007-2008, when the kick-starting of growth eventually triggered a commodity price boom, a surge in fossil fuel investment and a steep increase in CO2 emissions that will be locked into the atmosphere for thousands of years.

While not green, the stimulus has nonetheless raised global debt – from an already elevated level – and will have a lasting impact on public finances, at what is an unfortunate point in time. To reposition the global economy and energy systems in line with a 1.5°C scenario, an estimated investment of more than $90 trillion will be required over the next 15 years. Not all of this can be publicly financed, but governments will have to lead the way and be part of the solution. With limited fiscal space, resources must be used wisely, which is yet another reason why support measures to contain the COVID-19 crisis should target climate change.

The world is making progress - but more work is needed in multiple areas
The world is making progress - but more work is needed in multiple areas Image: Zurich

There are still hopes for the next round of stimulus. The EU's recovery plan, which amounts to close to €1.8 trillion ($2.1 trillion), is set up to support the recovery and kick off a multi-decade green investment wave. One third of funds have been earmarked for climate action, making it the greenest fiscal effort so far. The idea is that this will help to close the green investment gap – necessary to meet the EU’s 2050 net-zero emission target – by also pulling in private investment initiatives. It still needs to be agreed by the European and national parliaments, but this is an important step forward and raises prospects for generating a more sustainable recovery. Other countries need do more to catch up with the EU in this regard.

Once again, our scorecard on climate change (see above) sends out a clear message - changes in behaviours and technology are insufficient for the global economy to transition towards a 2°C compliant world. Moreover, the global pandemic is, by itself, unlikely to shift the trajectory on climate change. While the fall in CO2 emissions is welcome, a path towards sustainable reductions is – as yet – missing.


What’s the World Economic Forum doing about climate change?

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

The planet’s outlook is in our hands. Which future will we incentivize?

Carlos Correa

April 22, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum