• Transport infrastructure and services regularly overlook the traveling patterns and mobility needs of women, evidence shows.
  • The underfunding of bus stop lighting is one example of transport planners not considering the safety of women traveling at night.
  • This appears to stem from the fact that it is mainly men making policy and investment decisions.
  • The World Bank is helping countries to close the transport gender gap, addressing how women’s safety concerns affect their mobility needs.

Evidence from both developed and developing countries is showing that men and women have different patterns in traveling and accessing public spaces.

Women typically walk longer distances than men and make frequent, shorter trips with more stops to combine multiple tasks. Men, by contrast, tend to follow more direct and linear patterns. Females engage in more non-work-related travel than males and are more likely to be accompanied by children or elderly relatives. They are also more reliant on public transport.

Yet in most countries, transport infrastructure and services cater primarily to the needs of commuters who travel straight from their home to the central business district and back—an approach that largely overlooks the mobility needs and travel patterns of women.

A persistent gender bias

For a long time, transport planning and design have paid little attention to gender. Public investments in transport are often made to meet the travel needs of adult men. For example, public investment in the lighting of bus stops is often ignored, even though many women regard it as a pre-condition to using public transport at night (instead of relying on a car).

The reason goes back to the decision-making process: how and by whom policy and investment decisions in transport are being made. Decisions are often made solely on efficiency (cost-benefit) considerations and tend to ignore or underestimate other key considerations, such as equitable access. Making public decisions based on a single goal is much easier than trying to reconcile multiple ones (e.g., equitable access and efficiency).

The benefits of gender-informed policy

For example, it is estimated that an additional 20+ million women would work in the transport industry if the sector achieved gender parity in employment. And of course, a more diverse transport workforce would go a long way in addressing the gender bias described above.

Additionally, women have more sustainable mobility habits (e.g., use of public transport, cycling, and walking). Preserving these habits by making the right investment choices (e.g., adequate sidewalks and bicycle lanes) will be critical to ensure a low-carbon future.

"Without a solid commitment to gender mainstreaming, institutional strengthening, and gender budgeting in transport, progress toward the SDGs will inevitably suffer".

Strengthening the evidence basis

A key constraint is the lack of evidence and data to demonstrate how gender impacts transport. The World Bank’s IeConnect for Impact program seeks to close this gap. A recent thematic review on women’s access to public transport takes stock of what we know from the literature and highlights key program results. This exercise looked into several important issues, including how women’s safety in public spaces impacts their mobility:

  • In Rio de Janeiro, high-frequency crowdsourced data was used to quantify the economic cost of harassment in public transport. The results show that women value safe spaces, but also indicate that creating "safe spaces" reserved for women (e.g. women-only train cars, designated waiting areas on platforms, etc.) can sometimes normalize harassment outside those spaces. They reinforce norms that see women outside those bounds as provocative and assign harassment to the victim. The results demonstrate the importance of policies that directly address the violence and its perpetrators.
  • In Dar es Salaam, a new app was developed to measure instances of gender-based violence that women experience, witness, or perceive during their daily commute around the city. Scoping data indicates that over 59% of women interviewed experienced some form of violence at least once in the past six months while commuting.
  • In Delhi, a study quantified the economic consequences of the lack of travel safety by combining student-level survey data, a mapping of potential travel routes to colleges, and crowdsourced safety data from a mobile application safety data to study. Importantly, the study revealed that many women choose lower quality colleges than equally able men because of the fear of harassment.

Taking action to close the gender gap

Over the last few years, various groups and initiatives have emerged to improve our understanding of the gender dimension of transport, and elaborate policies to remedy the long-standing gender bias in transport policymaking (e.g., the Sustainable Mobility for All gender working group, the World Bank Transport Global Practice Gender Task Force, and the International Transport Forum (ITF) Gender Working group).

Sustainable Mobility for All established the first of these groups in 2018 by bringing together 18 international organizations and companies with a common interest in exploring the transport-gender nexus. The outcome of this initial work was a compilation of gender-responsive policy instruments from around the world. More recently, the group proposed a plan to pilot the application of these measures to the South African context.

In 2022, SuM4All will explore practical ways to enhance the role of women in the sector, with a strong focus on real-world examples and empirical case studies. If you are interested, we invite you to share your knowledge with other organizations and help us advance this important agenda.

What's the World Economic Forum doing about the gender gap?

The World Economic Forum has been measuring gender gaps since 2006 in the annual Global Gender Gap Report.

The Global Gender Gap Report tracks progress towards closing gender gaps on a national level. To turn these insights into concrete action and national progress, we have developed the Closing the Gender Gap Accelerators model for public private collaboration.

These accelerators have been convened in ten countries across three regions. Accelerators are established in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, and Panama in partnership with the InterAmerican Development Bank in Latin America and the Caribbean, Egypt and Jordan in the Middle East and North Africa, and Kazakhstan in Central Asia.

All Country Accelerators, along with Knowledge Partner countries demonstrating global leadership in closing gender gaps, are part of a wider ecosystem, the Global Learning Network, that facilitates exchange of insights and experiences through the Forum’s platform.

In 2019 Egypt became the first country in the Middle East and Africa to launch a Closing the Gender Gap Accelerator. While more women than men are now enrolled in university, women represent only a little over a third of professional and technical workers in Egypt. Women who are in the workforce are also less likely to be paid the same as their male colleagues for equivalent work or to reach senior management roles.

In these countries CEOs and ministers are working together in a three-year time frame on policies that help to further close the economic gender gaps in their countries. This includes extended parental leave, subsidized childcare and removing unconscious bias in recruitment, retention and promotion practices.

If you are a business in one of the Closing the Gender Gap Accelerator countries you can join the local membership base.

If you are a business or government in a country where we currently do not have a Closing the Gender Gap Accelerator you can reach out to us to explore opportunities for setting one up.