Economic Growth

Here's what US productivity growth looked like before and during the pandemic

This article first appeared on the NBER Digest.
A metal worker at a machine.

US productivity suffered in 2010-19. Image: Unsplash/Rafael Juárez

Laurent Belsie
Economics Editor, The Christian Science Monitor
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Economic Growth?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how United States is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

United States

  • US productivity grew more slowly in 2010-19 than in any other decade since World War II.
  • New research looks at why this slowdown occurred during the longest business cycle expansion in US history.
  • They say the 2010-19 issues were due to ‘excess layoffs’ as firms panicked during the Great Recession.
  • But why did productivity then rise during pandemic-hit 2020?
A chart showing US business sector output and labor productivity gaps from 2005 to 2019.
A look at the US business sector output and productivity gaps. Image: NBER

Between 2010 and 2019, US productivity grew more slowly than in any other decade of the post-World War II era. The business sector grew by an average of 1.1 percent per year, less than half of the 2.5 percent average annual growth from 1950 to 2009. Analysts have struggled to explain this slowdown during the longest business cycle expansion in US history and why productivity growth in 2020 soared to 4.1 percent, a sudden surge during a year marked by the short but sharp pandemic recession.

In A New Interpretation of Productivity Growth Dynamics in the Prepandemic and Pandemic Era US Economy, 1950–2022 (NBER Working Paper 30267), Robert J. Gordon and Hassan Sayed challenge the widespread notion that deviations of productivity growth from its long-run trend result solely from autonomous “productivity shocks.” Rather, the researchers show that these deviations from trend, which they call “productivity gap changes,” are strongly procyclical. As growth in output fluctuates, due to such demand-driven components as consumer durables, fixed investment, and inventory investment, firms react by adding or cutting total hours of work — that is, total employment times weekly hours per job. But the hours response is partial and lags the change in output. Since productivity changes are by definition equal to output changes minus changes in hours of work, productivity changes surge upward in the current quarter as the counterpart of the slow response of labor hours and then fall back as labor hours gradually complete their lagged response.

Discover

Beyond GDP: read the full transcript here

Hiring recoveries following excess layoffs during the Great Recession and the pandemic led to slow productivity growth in both the 2010–19 and 2021–22 periods.

The researchers argue that the strong productivity growth experienced in 2009 and slow productivity growth during 2010–19 were both due to “excess layoffs” as firms panicked during the Great Recession and fired workers, and this was followed by a gradual pace of rehiring after 2009. Because the cuts were so large, it took nearly a decade for hiring to recover, which is a major reason productivity growth over the 2010–19 period was so weak. The researchers use a regression analysis to calculate that productivity growth in 2008–09 would have been negative 0.8 percent rather than the measured rate of positive 3.2 percent if employers had not laid off so many workers in 2009. Moreover, the 2010–16 labor recovery would have seen far more robust productivity growth of 1.7 percent rather than the actual 0.9 percent.

To understand the rebound in productivity growth in 2020, the researchers construct a quarterly database of productivity levels and changes for 17 industries that they sort into three groups: goods, work-from-home services, and contact services. They conclude that the official data substantially overstate aggregate productivity growth in the second quarter of 2020, when the recession occurred, and understate it in the third quarter because pandemic-driven lockdowns skewed the data by dramatically shifting the industry mix away from low-productivity contact services, like restaurants and hotels, and toward high-productivity work-from-home industries, such as information technology and financial services. Over the nine quarters between 2020 and early 2022, productivity growth in the goods industries was negligible, productivity in contact services declined at an average annual rate of 2.6 percent, and work-from-home industries accounted for all of the economy’s overall positive productivity growth achievement, posting a strong 3.3 percent growth rate. The researchers link the upsurge of efficiency in work-from-home industries to recent surveys showing self-assessments of greater efficiency and unmeasured extra work hours during time previously spent commuting.

Have you read?

The researchers develop a simulation of their 2007–19 regression analysis to estimate the effects of excess layoffs in 2020 and rebound rehiring in 2021–22. They project that rehiring will continue for several years at an annual rate that is about 2.5 percent per year faster than otherwise as industries rehire the employees they cut during the pandemic lockdowns. This rehiring phenomenon explains both why the US economy in 2022 has been characterized by positive employment growth despite negative GDP growth, and why productivity growth was negative in the first two quarters of 2022.

Loading...
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Deep dive: Everything you need to know about the New Global Economy at #AMNC24

Gayle Markovitz

June 23, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum