Circular Economy

Disposable nappies are one of the biggest contributors to plastic waste – but how green are the alternatives?

Parent holds their baby's hand.

Nappies are very hard to recycle – particularly once used. Image: Unsplash/Aditya Romansa

Charlotte Edmond
Senior Writer, Forum Agenda
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Circular Economy?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Circular Economy is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Circular Economy

Listen to the article

  • More than 300,000 disposable nappies are sent to landfill or incinerated every minute, creating a huge problem for the environment.
  • Compostable and reusable alternatives are better for the environment, but still come with a cost.
  • The World Economic Forum is supporting the creation of a circular economy for nappies, helping a number of start-ups targeting the issue through its Uplink initiative.

Every minute more than 300,000 disposable nappies (or diapers) around the world are incinerated, sent to landfill or pollute the environment. They are one of the biggest contributors to plastic waste globally. When they were first conceived in the 1940s, no one could have predicted the curse they have become on the planet.

The plastics, pulps and viscose and cottons that go into each single-use nappy come with their own carbon footprint and environmental impact – for example, the industry gets through 248 million barrels of crude oil annually, according to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. And because of the combination of materials, they are very hard to recycle – particularly once used.

With each baby getting through 4,000-6,000 nappies in their pre-potty-trained life, even the newest of newborns very quickly racks up a sizable carbon footprint.

But that doesn’t mean that the arguments for the alternatives are necessarily clear-cut, with many ‘eco’ offerings also coming with an environmental cost.

Disposable nappies – a convenient solution

Disposable nappies are ubiquitous, with around 95% of families in developed countries opting to use them, reports the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Convenience is a huge part of the argument in their favour.

The market is worth over $60 billion annually. And even as birth rates in some countries decline, a growing ageing population means that the adult nappy market is increasing, predicted to reach $19 billion by 2031.

Similar challenges exist around sanitary waste products, which are made from many of the same materials as nappies.

The effects of single-use nappies are often worse in the developing world, where a lack of waste infrastructure and policymaking can make their disposal even more problematic. More than a fifth of waste found in Indonesia’s waterways is nappies, a 2018 World Bank report on marine debris in the country found. Plastic fibres, likely from nappies, have been found in the stomachs of fish in Javan riverways. Meanwhile, fishermen in West Africa complain of hundreds of nappies along the coastline.

Research also suggests that some nappies may contain toxic chemicals which could harm children and the environment.

Infographic illustrating statistics on the waste of disposable nappies.
Nearly 40 million tons of waste is created every year by nappies. Image: Ellen MacArthur Foundation

Some of the best ways to improve the environmental footprint of this option have come from lighter products, which use fewer materials. And using cellulose-based products for the absorbent part of the product rather than plastic-based can also have a positive impact.

In one innovative way to deal with the mounting problem of disposable nappy waste, researchers at the University of Kitakyushu in Japan have been experimenting with creating concrete with them. They have found that replacing 40% of the sand with shredded nappies has no impact on the strength of the concrete.

The inner materials of a diaper.
Many reusable nappies are made of a shaped outer with a disposable inner. Image: ResearchGate

A reusable alternative

Reusable nappies have come a long way since the days of towelling or cloth alternatives with pins. Many options now come with shaped material outers and washable inners.

The biggest hindrance for many people is the initial upfront cost. Although this is undoubtedly higher than single-use alternatives, over the long run they may work out to be more cost-effective, particularly if used for multiple children. Additionally, once the true costs of disposable nappies are taken into consideration, disposable nappies are artificially cheap, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation argues.

Another downside to reusable nappies is the washing and drying of them, which comes with its own environmental impact. In some areas, centralized washing services are available which will collect dirty nappies from households and drop off clean ones.

Washing below 60 degrees, with a full load, in an energy- and water-efficient washing machine can reduce the environmental impact of this option, a report for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) highlights. Line drying is also encouraged.

A circular model for nappies.
A circular economy for nappies sees them composted once used. Image: Ellen MacArthur Foundation

The compostable option

Another alternative is bio-based or compostable nappies, which avoid the use of plastic. These are also single-use, but have a better environmental profile than a standard single-use nappy. This includes helping to avoid freshwater and marine pollution, for example.

But these bio-based alternatives do come in tandem with higher agricultural land use and water depletion, the UNEP report notes. They also often contain plastic elements, such as the tabs to close them.

Figure illustrating the life cycle assessment of nappies.
In most circumstances reusable nappies are preferable. Image: UNEP

One innovator in this space is gDiapers, which won a challenge from the Global Plastic Innovation Network, convened by World Economic Forum’s UpLink and the Global Plastic Action Partnership.

The company uses only materials which are compostable, along with a ‘collects and exchanges’ function. This ensures no nappies go to waste. Once collected they are converted to a nutrient-rich compost.

Meanwhile Ubuni, another Uplink organization, is also innovating by creating bio-textile nappies from agricultural waste. After use, the nappies are also composted, helping create a circular economy.

Discover

What is the World Economic Forum doing about the circular economy?

Taking a lifecycle approach

The UNEP highlights the importance of taking a ‘lifecycle perspective’ when looking at the relative pros and cons of nappy options. The highest impacts of reusable nappies come in the use phase, whereas for single-use nappies it is in the production and disposal.

Consumer behaviour plays an important part in the relative impact of the options, the report also notes.

Have you read?
Loading...
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Circular EconomyNature and Biodiversity
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

What is the bioeconomy and how can it drive sustainable development?

Stefanie Ólives

July 12, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Sign in
  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum