Jobs and the Future of Work

Why LGBTI people face barriers to education and employment

Dominik Kohler
Social Development Consultant, Governance Global Practice
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Jobs and the Future of Work?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of Work is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of Work

World Bank President Jim Kim recently said “we will not reach our twin goals […] unless we address all forms of discrimination, including bias based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”

Sexual and gender minorities are particularly important for the Bank because they are (likely) overrepresented in the bottom 40% — the target of the Bank’s goal to promote shared prosperity.

Why only “likely”? Because robust data on LGBTI development outcomes is rare, even in high income countries.  With support from the World Bank’s Nordic Trust Fund, we are seeking to fill some of these data gaps, starting with research in the Western Balkans.

What we do know is that, across the board, barriers to education and employment contribute to greater chances of being poor – and this may be worse for LGBTI individuals.

Available data on Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people shows that youth are more likely to face barriers in getting a good education.  It’s also harder to find – and keep – a job, pushing LGBTI people further into poverty.

Education
American LGBT youth experience verbal harassment twice as often as their non-LGBT peers, are twice as likely to experiment with alcohol and drugs, and experience significantly higher rates of mental stress. Over 55% of US LGBT students feel unsafe at school, compared to 4% of students at-large. Similarly, over half of the LGBT respondents to a survey in Europe experienced verbal harassment in school.

Discrimination and exclusion have dire impacts. Around 29% of homosexual and 40% of bisexual US youthhave seriously considered suicide, compared to only 11% of their heterosexual peers. Studies from the UK and Australia indicate equally high rates of suicidal thoughts and attempts.

Data from developing countries is scarce but evidence from Brazil suggests similar experiences of LGBTI youth. Interviews with travestis [a local transgender term] showed that 44.9% of interviewees did not finish elementary school due to their sexual orientation and gender identity.

Employment
A 2012 European survey revealed higher unemployment rates for LGBT people (15%) compared to the general population (10.5%).  Why is this? Well, it’s harder to find a job and keep one if you are LGBTI.

A 2011 study sent two almost identical resumes to 1,700 US job openings. The resume listing membership in a college LGBT organization had a 40% lower chance of receiving a call back. Similar experiments in the UK and other countries showed the same patterns of discrimination.

LGBTI people who are open about their sexuality in the workplace are three times more likely to report experiencing discrimination than their closeted colleagues. In many countries – and 18 states in the USA – it’s actually legal to be fired because you’re LGBT.
And if you do find and keep a job, gay people are likely to earn less. An analysis of multiple income studies found gay men to earn less than heterosexual men with similar skills and experience.

Poverty and hunger
Higher barriers to education, mental stress and the lack of decent employment pushes people into poverty.  This is also true for LGBTI people. In a US study 29% of LGBT respondents reported food insecurity in the previous year, compared to 16% nationwide.  And a survey in Chhattisgarh, India, found the majority of the trans population live below the poverty line.

President Kim recently said, “(…) barriers and mistreatment create living conditions that prevent LGBTI people from reaching their full potential.” We won’t be able to help our client countries develop policies and operations to improve outcomes for the bottom 40% until we know more about the people who make up this group. This means for more robust data collection and special consideration of development outcomes for LGBTI individuals.

This article was first published by The World Bank’s Governance for Development blog. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Dominik Kohler is a social development consultant with the Governance Global Practice. 

Image: People take part in a Gay Pride parade in downtown Seville June 25, 2011. REUTERS/Javier Diaz.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Jobs and the Future of WorkEquity, Diversity and InclusionEducation and Skills
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

How the ‘NO, NO’ Matrix can help professionals plan for success

Eli Joseph

April 19, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum