Climate Change

Scientists have proposed three colossal geoengineering projects to slow polar melting

Snow-covered mountains look over the Isfjord in Svalbard, June 1, 2012. The Svalbard archipelago on Europe's northern edge is probably the remotest and wildest place in the Arctic with regularly scheduled flights, so get there quick before the crowds discover its crystal clear waters, glaciers and wildlife. Picture taken June 1, 2012. To match story TRAVEL-SVALBARD/     REUTERS/Balazs Koranyi (NORWAY - Tags: TRAVEL SOCIETY)

A giant wall, artificial islands and cooling water are three ways that scientists might slow polar melting. Image: REUTERS/Balazs Koranyi

Alex Gray
Senior Writer, Formative Content
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Climate Change?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Climate Change is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Climate Change

Sea levels are rising rapidly as global warming melts polar ice caps. By one estimate, if nothing is done, between 0.5% and 5% of the world’s population will be affected by flooding each year from 2100.

Image: Nature

That would mean millions of people displaced.

The cheapest and most effective way to manage climate change - and sea level rise - is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This has to be done quickly to keep warming well below well below 2°C. But, to buy some time, four climate scientists have an alternative.

In a paper for the journal Nature they argue that disastrous sea level rise could be delayed if we stop Antarctica and Greenland’s main glaciers from melting.

And they have come up with proposals for massive geoengineering projects that they say could stop much of Antarctica and Greenland’s grounded ice from reaching the sea for centuries. This, they say, would give the world enough time to get to grips with global warming.

A giant wall to block warm water

The scientists’ first suggestion concerns Jakobshavn – Greenland’s biggest and fastest-moving glacier and the largest contributor to sea-level rise of any glacier in the Northern Hemisphere. Ice loss from Jakobshavn explains around 4% of 20th century sea-level rise.

Jakobshavn, on Greenland’s west coast, contributes more to sea-level rise than any other glacier in the Northern Hemisphere. Image: NASA

Warmer currents from the Atlantic are melting the glacier’s base, so the scientists propose building a wall up to 100m tall in front to prevent the warm water from reaching it.

The wall would be made up of gravel and sand piled up on the sea bed to create an artificial embankment, and would be clad in concrete to stop erosion.

This won't help with the problem of warm air reaching the top of the glacier, but sea melting happens much quicker and less predictably.

Artificial islands to pin ice shelves

When glaciers slide into the sea they form ice shelves. Image: ScienceDaily

As glaciers slip into the sea they create enormous ice shelves. Warmer waters cause these ice shelves to become thinner, and in some cases break off completely, exposing the glacier and speeding up sea level rise.

There are two glaciers in particular, Pine Island and Thwaites, in West Antarctica, that are concerning the scientists. As these melt they will become the largest sources of sea-level rise over the next two centuries.

The scientists propose shoring up ice shelves in front of the two glaciers by constructing artificial islands, extended from outcrops or built on the sea floor.

Pumping or cooling water beneath

As a glacier slides down rock, it generates heat. This heat then creates fast-flowing streams that pour into the sea, which, in turn, makes the glacier move faster.

In Antarctica these streams can be quite shallow, and the scientists propose either pumping out the water or freezing it by circulating cooled water beneath. This would slow the progress of the glacier.

Are these projects feasible?

The scientists admit that much work remains to be done to figure out if these projects are even feasible.

“The glaciers concerned need extensive study, including mapping the geomorphology of their beds and the rates at which they are melting,” they say.

In addition, working in these frozen areas of the world would be incredibly difficult and hazardous.

And expensive. The costs of these projects would run into billions of dollars. But the scientists argue that enormous feats of civil engineering have been performed already. For example, Hong Kong’s international airport added 1% to the city’s land area and cost more than $20 billion.

They also say that the cost of shoring up the defences of coastal cities will cost billions of dollars, and that this money could be directed instead at the source of the flooding.

But there would be possible unintended consequences for the local population, fisheries and tourism industries.

And there is also the issue of who pays for the work, and how an international agreement can be reached in an era of political volatility.

But perhaps the biggest risk, the authors argue, is doing nothing.

“We think that geoengineering of glaciers could delay much of Greenland and Antarctica’s grounded ice from reaching the sea for centuries, buying time to address global warming,” they say.

“We understand the hesitancy to interfere with glaciers – as glaciologists, we know the pristine beauty of these places. But we have also stood on ice shelves that are now open ocean. If the world does nothing, ice sheets will keep shrinking and the losses will accelerate. Even if greenhouse-gas emissions are slashed, which looks unlikely, it would take decades for the climate to stabilize.”

Have you read?
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Climate ChangeFuture of the Environment
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

From São Paulo to Venice: 15 cities with ambitious zero-carbon projects

Victoria Masterson

April 12, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum