Stakeholder Capitalism

Why doing nothing is the biggest corporate climate risk of all

A resident paddles his kayak out of his neighborhood after checking the condition of his house as river levels rise into town in the aftermath of Hurricane Matthew, in Greenville, North Carolina, U.S. October 14, 2016.

Climate change is already here - but are businesses changing fast enough to keep up? Image: REUTERS/Jonathan Drake

Richard Mattison
CEO, Trucost, part of S&P Global
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Stakeholder Capitalism?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Corporate Governance is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Better Business

This article is part of: World Economic Forum Annual Meeting
  • 60% of S&P 500 companies own assets at risk from climate change
  • Understanding and responding to these risks will require greater transparency
  • Any delay in companies taking decisive action now could be disastrous

Companies in the benchmark S&P 500 Index own physical assets across 68 countries globally - with 60% holding assets that are at high risk of at least one type of climate change-related physical risk. In this light, the need for determined action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit the effects of climate change poses important transition risks for companies and investors through regulation, changing market dynamics and technology, among other factors.

Understanding climate risk depends on transparency around the geographic exposures of assets and operations. But companies’ exposures and resilience don’t conform to clear patterns, highlighting the need for in-depth investor analysis to evaluate climate risk at the asset and company level. It’s important to note that the location of assets is the key factor in determining the extent of these risks - more than the industry or sector in which a company operates.

Granted, it’s not possible to definitively say that climate change has “caused” a particular event, but the scientific community has a higher level of confidence in certain areas, such as extreme temperatures and precipitation rates, given that there is more data to analyze. S&P Global data show that heatwaves, wildfires, water stress and hurricanes linked to increasing average global temperatures represent the biggest physical risks for S&P 500 companies.

Have you read?

S&P Global Platts analysts estimate that an adherence to historic trends would send energy-combustion carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions skyrocketing to approximately 50 gigatonnes by 2050, up from 35 gigatonnes today. Platts’s most likely scenario envisions emissions stabilizing after peaking soon after 2025. This is still far above needed targets.

Even a stabilization of our CO2 output would fuel further climate change, because we currently pump CO2 into the atmosphere at a faster pace than natural processes such as photosynthesis and oceanic absorption can filter out. Absent a significant turnaround in this trend, climate change is almost certain to cause continued substantial losses to infrastructure and property, and, worse, increased illness and death. According to estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO), anthropogenic climate change was already leading to at least 5 million cases of disease and more than 150,000 deaths annually as long ago as 2000—that’s 20 years ago. Considering that WHO now projects annual deaths will reach 250,000 in the period 2030-2050, and it’s clear that anything less than decisive, widespread action is an imminent danger - not just to future generations, but to the almost 8 billion people alive today.

All told, physical and transition risks are rising and will impact companies differently based on the geographic distribution of their assets. Trucost, part of S&P Global, recently launched its Climate Change Physical Risk Analytics, helping companies and investors understand their exposure to a range of physical risks at the asset level including floods, droughts, wildfires, heatwaves and extreme weather events. Trucost predicted in March last year that 2019 would be the year in which companies transform the way they manage climate-related issues; that environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns are critically important to capturing mainstream investor attention; and that ESG issues are reshaping business models across a broad swathe of corporate America. Given all of the focus on ESG in financial markets - with lenders and investors, among others, all seeking greater clarity around the prospects for sustainable finance - this is ringing true.

We are still a long way from a 2-degree scenario
We are still a long way from a 2-degree scenario Image: S&P Global

For now, much of the effort to address the risks of climate change have come in the area of adaptation - that is, adjusting to the effects, rather than trying to prevent them (because, in many cases, they’re already happening). Unfortunately, some estimates place adaptation funding needs by 2030 at as much as nine times what is now being spent. And the gap isn’t just a problem for emerging economies. While developed countries are more resilient to extreme weather events, many need substantial adaptation investments to prepare.

In particular, power-generation companies are typically exposed to high carbon-pricing risks, but physical risks vary significantly based on the geographic operations of each company. Conversely, S&P 500 financial firms with low emissions generally have lower carbon-pricing risk exposure, but in some cases own assets at high risk of physical climate change.

Discover

What’s the World Economic Forum doing about climate change?

Other sectors also face heightened risks. For example, real estate investment trusts (REITs) are exposed to moderate or high risk of inundation due to sea level rise, highlighting the need for effective planning and flood-mitigation measures to preserve asset values. Similarly, mining properties owned by S&P 500 companies are exposed to high risk of water stress, with significant potential effects on operational efficiency and operating costs.

In the end, for these sectors - and for all of us - the biggest risk may be inaction.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Stakeholder CapitalismForum InstitutionalClimate Action
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

To create a 'sustainomy' businesses must focus on the ecosystem, not just the market

"Arm" Piyachart Isarabhakdee

June 17, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum