Nature and Biodiversity

Nature funding must triple by 2030 to protect land, wildlife and climate

image of an elephant

Investment of about $8 trillion is needed by 2050 to help meet climate goals and stem the loss of plant and animal species, says a new U.N. report Image: Unsplash/David Clode

Michael Taylor
Asia correspondent and sub-editor, Thomson Reuters Foundation
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Nature and Biodiversity?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Nature and Biodiversity is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Long-Term Investing, Infrastructure and Development

  • A U.N. report has said that global annual spending to protect nature needs to triple this decade and then rise to $536 billion by 2050.
  • Inger Andersen, executive director of the UNEP programme, has said this large sum of money is "peanuts" to secure the planet's and our own future.
  • Failure to increase investments would threaten the Paris Agreement goals, warns the UNEP's Ivo Mulder.
  • The U.N. report called on governments to include biodiversity and climate measures in their pandemic stimulus packages.

Global annual spending to protect and restore nature needs to triple this decade to about $350 billion by 2030 and rise to $536 billion by 2050, a U.N. report said, urging a shift in mindset among financiers, businesses and governments.

The inaugural State of Finance for Nature report looked at how to tackle the planet's climate, biodiversity and land degradation crises, estimating about $8 trillion in investment would be needed by mid-century to safeguard natural systems.

Inger Andersen, executive director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), told the report launch the amounts required may sound large but "it's peanuts when we are frankly talking about securing the planet and our very own future".

Have you read?

"Our health, the quality of our lives, our jobs, temperature regulation, the housing we build and of course the food we eat, the water we drink" all depend on well-functioning natural systems, she said.

Report co-author Ivo Mulder, who heads UNEP's climate finance unit, said financial flows should work with nature rather than against it.

"It is more an opportunity to see how can you continue to do business, how can governments continue to grow economically - but do so in a way that is more equitable and sustainable. It is not impossible," he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Annual investment in nature, excluding money pledged but not yet delivered, totalled $133 billion in 2020, said the report, with public funds making up 86% and private finance the rest.

Government spending was mainly for biodiversity protection, forest and peatland restoration, regenerative agriculture and water conservation, added the report by UNEP, the World Economic Forum and the Economics of Land Degradation Initiative.

A failure to ramp up investments in nature would threaten the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate change, Mulder warned, while more animal and plant species would be lost.

Better conservation and management of natural areas, such as parks, forests and wildernesses, is seen as a key tool for nations to protect ecosystems and meet emissions reduction targets.

Cutting down forests has major implications for global goals to curb climate change, as trees absorb about a third of the planet-warming carbon emissions produced worldwide.

Forests also provide food and livelihoods, are habitat for wildlife and support tropical rainfall.

Andersen said protecting natural stores of carbon like forests, peatland and the ocean "is not a substitute for decarbonisation" of the global economy but rather "part of a long-term solution" to safeguard the Earth and its climate.

Build back greener

The report called on governments to include biodiversity and climate measures in their pandemic stimulus packages, noting that nature accounts for just 2.5% of projected COVID-19 economic recovery spending worldwide.

Governments must also ensure development aid contains conditions and targets to help cut climate-heating emissions, protect forests and limit land degradation, Mulder said.

The report recommended reforming taxes and redirecting subsidies for fossil fuels and agricultural chemicals, which amount to hundreds of billions of dollars per year, to encourage greener farming and other activities that nurture nature.

Businesses should invest more in making their supply chains sustainable, while new revenue streams created by forest carbon markets and nature-based projects could help companies meet their net-zero emissions goals, it added.

Banks will also need to take into account the negative impacts of their lending on nature and the climate, Mulder said.

Firms linked to destruction of nature risk their reputations, and more extreme weather including droughts and floods - often worse in degraded ecosystems - can increase business costs, he added.

Andersen said there was a business case for investing in nature but "we need to make it stronger and clearer".


What’s the World Economic Forum doing about climate change?

A separate report released last year estimated $722 billion-$967 billion would be needed annually to halt the global decline in biodiversity by 2030.

Mulder said the estimate in the new U.N. report was lower as it analysed only land-related funding and did not include oceans. He called it a "starting point" for tracking nature-based investments.

It comes as a coalition of about 60 countries pushes to protect at least 30% of land and oceans by 2030, ahead of a key U.N. biodiversity summit in Kunming, China, set for October.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Nature and BiodiversityClimate ActionSustainable Development
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

World breaches critical 1.5°C warming threshold 12 months in a row, and other nature and climate stories you need to read this week

Tom Crowfoot

July 17, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Sign in
  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum