Energy Transition

How did one European country free itself from Russian gas?

Lithuanian Navy personnel raise the national flag as floating storage regasification unit (FSRU) "Independence" is escorted (rear) to the liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal in Klaipeda port October 27, 2014. Lithuania will be able to survive without Russian gas after its LNG terminal opened today, redrawing the energy map for the Baltic states. The floating LNG import terminal at the port of Klaipeda means the end of the supply monopoly of Russia's Gazprom and isolation from global gas markets. REUTERS/Ints Kalnins (LITHUANIA - Tags: BUSINESS ENERGY MARITIME MILITARY POLITICS)

Lithuanian Navy personnel during the unveiling of a liquefied natural gas terminal, October 27, 2014. Image: REUTERS/Ints Kalnins

John Letzing
Digital Editor, World Economic Forum Geneva
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Energy Transition?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Energy Transition is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Energy Transition

Listen to the article

  • Lithuania recently announced that it no longer needs to import Russian gas.
  • Many countries now aim to cut energy ties with Russia following its invasion of Ukraine.
  • This shift points to a new and more uncertain reality for the global economy.

It seems clear now that buying Russian oil and gas means funding an attempt to dismantle a sovereign country, and indirectly enabling carnage.

Europe in particular has struggled with its dependence on fossil fuels from the “aggressor nation” waging war in Ukraine. Yet, one European state recently managed to liberate itself from Russian gas. How?

In 2014, several days after a Russian spy plane reportedly committed the first serious violation of NATO airspace since the fall of the Berlin Wall, and seven months after Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea, officials gathered at a Lithuanian port for the unveiling of a new liquefied natural gas terminal.

Nobody would be able to dictate the price of gas to Lithuania anymore, the country’s president said then, “or buy our political will.”

She was right. As of earlier this month, Lithuania no longer has to import Russian gas for domestic consumption – and it’s been cited as an example for other EU member states to follow.

Lithuania’s gas independence is being celebrated, though it may point to an uncertain new economic era.

After the Cold War, a prevailing logic behind expanding economic ties was simple: the risk of cratering its own economy would serve as a check on Russia’s behavior. Russia has now obliterated that logic.

The current scramble to sever energy links is monumental. According to one measure, the EU has already paid more than €39 billion for Russian fossil fuels including gas since the start of the invasion in February.

Image: World Economic Forum

Germany’s situation in particular has drawn scrutiny. It says it can’t wean itself from Russian gas “at least” until 2024, due to a close energy relationship solidified in the 1990s and underpinned by a pair of pipelines.

A country that had literally been cut into two parts by the Cold War opted to pursue an economic tie-up meant to help maintain peace and stability. But Lithuania had something else in mind, due to its own difficult history.

Finding different paths around Russian energy

Lithuania itself is evidence that hubs of economic influence can shift dramatically over time.

At one point in the 15th century, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania covered an area larger than modern France and Germany combined. A Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth followed, which was divided up by 1795 and Lithuania fell under the control of the Russian Empire.

In 1940 the country was annexed by the Soviet Union, and it didn’t fully emerge again until 1991. These historical details are a key part of any story about Lithuania’s drive to forego Russian energy.

For Germany, doing the same thing is not so simple. Experts think it would lose about €220 billion in economic output by shutting off Russian gas now, and fall into a deep recession.

Lithuanian Empire under the rule of Vytautas the Great (AD 1392 – AD 1430).
Lithuanian Empire under the rule of Vytautas the Great (AD 1392 – AD 1430). Image: Institut Géograph de Kummerly & Frey

An abrupt shift away from importing Russian energy also promises to feed further discussion about the global economy becoming far less global.

Pundits have been pondering the potential for de-globalization at least since the 2008 financial crisis. COVID-19 and related supply chain glitches brought another round of speculation. Russia’s military onslaught has spurred more meditation on the theme.

Some argue the global economy was a lot less interconnected prior to the war in Ukraine than many people assume.

Anyone who attempted something as simple as buying a bicycle during the thick of the pandemic, or who has looked into the origins of the many parts necessary to assemble a typical iPhone, may have trouble believing that.

Much more will likely be written soon about where the global economy goes from here, now that it seems Russia will be further isolated – or at least realigned.

One thing seems certain: if more countries start limiting their commercial interaction with others to punish actual transgressions, or to protect against those presumed inevitable based on the historical record, the global economy will start to look very different indeed.

More reading on Lithuania and Russian gas

For more context, here are links to further reading from the World Economic Forum's Strategic Intelligence platform:

  • As Lithuania celebrates a form of independence from Russia, it faces serious trade-related pressure from another global power that has implications for its fellow EU members, according to this piece. (The Diplomat)
  • “Companies and countries need each other.” Many see the invasion of Ukraine forcing the pendulum of international affairs away from globalization, but this dissenting professor takes a more “boring” view. (Wharton School)
  • Lithuania’s small size and generally limited resources incentivize specialization at the EU level, according to this analysis, which it’s pursued by focusing on Russia-related issues. (European Council on Foreign Relations)
  • Instead of a full embargo on Russian oil and gas, this piece argues that the EU should hit them with import tariffs – to reduce Russia’s income while limiting collateral economic damage. (Social Europe)
  • When cutting ties threatens public health – after Bangladesh abstained from a UN resolution condemning the Russian invasion, Lithuania reversed a decision to donate COVID-19 vaccines to the country, according to this piece. (The Diplomat)
  • As Europe tries to wean itself from Russian fossil fuels Israel hopes to help fill the gap with gas from its offshore reserves, according to this report. (Al Monitor)
  • Is fracking the answer for Germany? No, according a government minister cited in this report; while the northern lowlands sit on a large amount of gas, it’s likely to stay there due to groundwater protection legislation. (Clean Energy Wire)

On the Strategic Intelligence platform, you can find feeds of expert analysis related to Energy, International Security and hundreds of additional topics. You’ll need to register to view.

Image: World Economic Forum
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Energy TransitionResilience, Peace and Security
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

These 4 countries are leading the way in the energy transition

Sarah Moin

June 19, 2024

About Us



Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum