Forum Institutional

Transforming high-emitting assets is hard, but private equity could help

private equity decarbonizing high-emitting assets

Private equity can play a role in decarbonizing high-emitting assets in sectors such as energy, aviation and shipping. Image: Unsplash/@marekpiwnicki

Shrinal Sheth
Project Lead, Financial Innovation, World Economic Forum
Meagan Andrews
Lead, Capital Markets Initiatives, World Economic Forum
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Forum Institutional?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how SDG 13: Climate Action is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

SDG 13: Climate Action

This article is part of: World Economic Forum Annual Meeting

Listen to the article

  • Growing numbers of institutional investors are committing to net-zero targets.
  • While divesting from high-emitting assets and sectors often seems like the easiest and quickest route to net-zero, transformation can have some long-term benefits.
  • Private equity can help support the transformation process as one of several sectors with a role to play in decarbonizing high-emitting assets.

Institutional investors are facing immense pressure to commit to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 – and many are doing so. According to a recent survey, almost half of all institutional investors have either made a public commitment to achieve net-zero emissions from their investment portfolio by 2050 (31%) or are in the process of making this commitment (16%).

While many are still investigating what net zero means for them, private equity might help with decarbonizing high-emitting assets.
While many are still investigating what net zero means for them, private equity might help with decarbonizing high-emitting assets. Image: 2022 Robeco Global Climate Survey

Once a commitment has been made, however, the following questions must be answered: “how will we get there?” and “what do we do with the highest emitting assets?”

Transformation versus divestment

One of the hottest sustainable investing topics today is the debate between either divesting from such assets or transforming them. According to the previously-cited survey, investors say they will divest around a fifth of their overall portfolios in the next five years to reduce exposure to high-emitting assets. This might help these organisations achieve their net-zero targets, but is it really solving the core problem?

While it is easy to see this transformation versus divestment debate through a binary lens, the answer may lie somewhere in between. Divestment does offer short-term quick wins for investors and the world, but in reality, it simply transfers the ownership and does not remove sustainability-laggard assets from the global mix. It also puts emerging markets at a distinct disadvantage. Such regions may be high emitters today, but divestment could starve these markets of the capital needed to transition to net zero.

Have you read?

On the other side of the spectrum, decarbonizing high-emitting assets is hard (and expensive). It demands reimagining processes from scratch and redesigning existing sites with rebuilds or retrofits. Many are impossible to decarbonize completely and will also require investment in future breakthrough technologies.

All of this is not easy and, more often than not, comes at a high cost. It also requires tolerating temporary spikes in emissions across the portfolio, rather than a steady downward trend toward net-zero. For institutional investors, in particular, this requires clear communication with stakeholders and the ability to withstand other political pressures in the meantime.

How can private equity help in decarbonizing high-emitting assets?

So what can private equity do? This is where the industry has the opportunity for disproportionate impact. With its full ownership governance model and relative freedom from short-term pressures, private equity funds can earn a lucrative early mover advantage by developing differentiated capabilities when it comes to decarbonization.

There are four strategies that can be used, which are mapped out more fully in the World Economic Forum’s whitepaper, “Creating Value through Sustainability in Private Markets”. These are:

  • Enhancing asset-level transparency, with proactive communication against a clear transformation plan to mitigate "headline risk"
  • Investing in capacity-building for deal teams, so that they can credibly engage portfolio companies on transformation opportunities and build sustainability "playbooks"
  • Increasing the flexibility in holding periods where necessary to undertake ambitious transformation programmes and capture the created value at the end of a deal
  • Advocating for "change-over-time” emissions targets to supplement levels-based targets, allowing for active acquisition and transformation of heavy emitters.

This doesn’t mean it’s easy. Even if the private equity industry executes on all four points, the key to the success of this kind of sustainable transformation strategy will be the tolerance for assets that may have higher emissions in the short term.

Investment funds themselves, as well as their limited partners (the institutional investors), must consider that hard-to-abate sectors such as aviation and shipping will need more time to achieve long-term emission reduction targets. They will need to clearly communicate the decarbonization strategy in the meantime, withstanding political and other stakeholder pressure to move faster.

Discover

How is the World Economic Forum facilitating the transition to clean energy?

Finally, private equity can’t do it alone. Even with private equity’s “dry powder” – or capital available for investment – at historic levels of $1.78 trillion, the industry cannot put a significant dent in the net-zero transition. Their expertise in asset transformation must be accompanied by blended finance and other de-risking mechanisms – all of which require greater cooperation across the financial services system and with public policymakers. This is a problem that no industry can solve alone.

Loading...
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Forum InstitutionalEnergy Transition
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

What to expect at the Special Meeting on Global Cooperation, Growth and Energy for Development

Spencer Feingold and Gayle Markovitz

April 19, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum