Climate and Nature

Compensation vs. contribution: Comparing climate spending models

climate spending models contribution compensation

The obvious way to enjoy all the "pros" with none of the "cons" would be to adopt both compensation and contribution approaches in your climate spending. Image: Unsplash/baileyzindel

Ariel Hayward
Climate Strategy and Solutions Lead, Patch
Share:
Our Impact
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Nature and Biodiversity is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Climate and Nature

Have you read?
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Climate and NatureNature and BiodiversityEnergy Transition
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

More on Climate and Nature
See all

The climate and nature agendas must align at COP28. Can help come from space?

Marco Lambertini and Yana Gevorgyan

December 1, 2023

About Us

Events

Media

More from the Forum

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2023 World Economic Forum