
AI is convicting criminals and determining jail time, but is it fair?
In a world where legal processes are influenced by artificially intelligent judges and juries, these four principles could help guard against bias.
Behavioural Designer and UX Researcher, Google. Studied at Harvard University, University of Oxford and the LSE. 2017, PhD (DPhil) in Computational Social Science; 2013, MSc (Hons) in the Social Sciences of the Internet; 2012, BSc (Hons) in Management. Stelios Scholar. Formerly, at Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, Bertelsmann, Mars and Rocket Internet. Founder and CEO, Avantgarde Analytics, a machine learning startup that harnesses AI and behavioural psychology for the next generation of algorithmic campaigns. Writer, consultant and teacher on the social dynamics of the Internet. Formerly, Curator of the Oxford Hub, Global Shapers, World Economic Forum. Member of the WEF Expert Network. Recipient of awards. Forbes 30 Under 30 Europe, Law and Policy. Top 100 Visionary Leaders Under 30, Real Leaders Magazine. Research and commentary featured in 40 countries and 20 languages, including Fortune, Forbes, BBC, Euronews, Newsweek and The New York Times. Expertise: UX, human-centred machine learning, complex social networks and behavioural science.
In a world where legal processes are influenced by artificially intelligent judges and juries, these four principles could help guard against bias.
Artificial intelligence offers much promise. But it has also given rise to “AI solutionism” - the philosophy that, given enough data, machine learning algorithms can solve all of humanity...
Il est indispensable de s'accorder sur une définition commune du mot éthique avant de concevoir des machines intelligentes.
Producing a 'good samaritan robot' could mean finally defining what humans have failed to agree on for millennia – how to define morality.
It is easy to blame AI for the world’s wrongs and for lost elections. But the tools that are used to mislead and misinform could equally be re-purposed to support democracy.
Using technology to counteract computational propaganda may be our only hope to preserve democracy as we know it. And Macron’s campaign is a prime example of that.
人类的发展进程是件奇怪的事情:我们只花了不到40年,就把人类送上了月球;然而,我们却还需要170年才能让女性坐在全球各大公司的董事会会议室中。最新一期的《全球性别差距报告》显示,我们仍需170年才能消灭全球经济领域的性别差距。在政治领域,这一进程所需要的时间恐怕还要更长。
170 years is too long to wait for gender equality at work. So here are 5 smart ways we can help enhance the gender parity situation at our workplaces.
If fed enough data, an AI assistant could give recommendations that are far more accurate and personalized than we’d receive from even our closest friends, writes Vyacheslav Polonski.
By granting a disproportionate amount of clout to the most extreme opinions, the internet could pose a severe threat to democracy as we know it.