Industries in Depth

This is the Impossible Burger, a beefburger but without the beef

Cows look on during feeding at the livestock breeding complex and collective farm named after Vasily Chapaev near the Russian southern city of Stavropol, March 17, 2015. REUTERS/Eduard Korniyenko

Image: REUTERS/Eduard Korniyenko

Joe Myers
Writer, Forum Stories

It looks like a beefburger. It smells like a beef burger. And apparently, it tastes like a beef burger. The surprising thing? It contains no meat.

The Impossible Burger is the creation of Impossible Foods and was launched last month in New York. It is designed to provide all the flavour and experience of a regular beefburger, without the environmental impact of raising cows for meat.

“We have begun the movement to build a new kind of global food system,” explained Patrick Brown, CEO and founder of Impossible Food, in a media release. “One that creates new markets for farmers, supports a more resilient food supply, and offers consumers new choices for the meat and dairy products they know and love – ones that are equally delicious but made from plants.”

A ‘magic ingredient’

 The Impossible Burger
Image: Impossible Foods

By creating meat and dairy substitutes from plants, Impossible Foods is working to reduce the impact of animal farming on the environment. The company claims that by not using beef, one of their burgers uses 95% less land, 74% less water and reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 87%.

So how did they do it?

It's all down to a molecule called "heme". Impossible Foods describes it as the "magic ingredient that makes meat look, cook and taste gloriously meaty". Real meat is full of heme, and it’s also a building block for life on Earth. So the company has been able to use a plant-based heme protein to create the Impossible Burger.

Impossible Burger patties
Image: Impossible Foods

A molecule-size solution to a big problem

The world’s appetite for meat is set to double between 2000 and 2050, as the global population grows and economies become wealthier.

 Global demand for meat 2005 to 2050
Image: Bill Gates

The environmental impact of raising animals for consumption is significant. Research suggests that food production contributes to more than a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions, and 80% of that is the result of animal agriculture.

The resources needed to create just one quarter-pounder burger are extraordinary: 6.7lbs (3kg) of feed, 52.8 gallons (240 litres) of water, 74.5 square feet (6.9 sq metres) of land and 1,000 Btu (1055 kJ) of energy. Watch this video to find out more:

Loading...

Reducing the environmental impact of meat-eating is therefore a major challenge, and one that requires urgent action.

Innovative solutions such as home-grown meat, or the Impossible Burger, are needed because, as Bill Gates wrote in 2013, “we can’t ask everyone to become vegetarians”.

Have you read?

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Future of the Environment

Related topics:
Industries in DepthNature and Biodiversity
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of the Environment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

1:49

Impact printing: Robot speed-prints walls by firing lumps of clay

Why having low-carbon buildings also makes financial sense

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum