Nature and Biodiversity

What is the Anthropocene? And why does it matter?

A boy touches a 45-metre (148-feet) long wall lighted by colour rays at an exhibition hall in Wuhan, central China's Hubei province May 1, 2007. Picture taken May 1, 2007. REUTERS/China Daily (CHINA) CHINA OUT

People have had a profound impact on the planet Image: REUTERS/China Daily

Joe Myers
Writer, Forum Stories

Our impact on Earth is now so significant that we should declare an entirely distinct geological epoch - the Anthropocene - according to the Working Group on the Anthropocene (WGA).

The group of experts presented the recommendation to the International Geological Congress on Monday 29 August, drawing on a study published in Science in January. The majority of the group have voted to formally designate the Anthropocene and recommend that its start date should be around the 1950s.

“Being able to pinpoint an interval of time is saying something about how we have had an incredible impact on the environment of our planet,” Dr Colin Waters, principal geologist at the British Geological Survey and WGA secretary, told The Guardian.

What is an epoch?

Epochs form part of the Earth’s official timeline. All 4.6 billion years are split into Eons, Eras, Periods, Epochs and Ages - as designated by the International Commission on Stratigraphy. The Earth’s current epoch, the Holocene, started at the end of the last ice age, around 12,000 years ago.

In comparison, the current Eon (in British English Aeon) is the Phanerozoic, which started some 540 million years ago.

 Geological timeline
Image: The Economist

What is the Anthropocene?

The Anthropocene is a new, present day epoch, in which scientists say we have significantly altered the Earth through human activity. These changes include global warming, habitat loss, changes in the chemical composition of the atmosphere, oceans and soil, and animal extinctions.

Although the new epoch has yet to be officially declared, the WGA believes we should now consider it distinct from the Holocene.

 International Chronostratigraphic Chart
Image: International Commission on Stratigraphy

A larger version of this graphic is available here.

If ratified, it would sit above the Holocene in the top left of the chart above. However, for it to make it onto the "official" timeline, it first needs to be approved by the International Commission on Stratigraphy and also by the executive committee of the International Union of Geological Sciences.

The golden spike

The next step for the WGA is to identify a "golden spike" – a global marker in the environment that indicates the start of the new age. This marker should be visible years – even millions of years – into the future for scientists to see. This would allow them to identify the start of the Anthropocene.

For example, the end of the Cretaceous epoch is defined by the presence of iridium in sediment around the world. This was spread from the meteorite that signalled the end of the dinosaurs.

The panel is split on what they believe the best spike will be for the Athropocene.

Fallout from nuclear bomb tests in the 1950 is seen a likely candidate. This could be found in ice layers, marine or lake sediment or potentially stalagmites and stalactites.

Other candidates include plastics, concrete particles, or soot and pollution from power stations. Scientists have also suggested that fossils from domestic chickens could be a defining marker that could define the Anthropocene.

The humble chicken could herald a new geological era Image: REUTERS/Mike Segar

“Since the mid-20th century, it has become the world’s most common bird. It has been fossilised in thousands of landfill sites and on street corners around the world,” explains Professor Jan Zalasiewicz, chair of the WGA. “It is also a much bigger bird with a different skeleton than its pre-war ancestor.”

Why this matters

If, as the WGA believes, we are now living in a new geological age, it is a stark reminder of our impact on earth.

The group believes our activity has set the Earth system on a different trajectory.

"In the last century we have had such a huge impact that we’re actually taking the planet away from that natural [climate] oscillation and changing the trend for global temperatures from what should have been a cooling trend to a warming trend,” explained Dr Waters to The Independent.

Have you read?

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Future of the Environment

Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of the Environment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Why nature loss should be measured in the same way carbon emissions are tracked

Dorothy Abade-Maseke and Gavin Edwards

December 13, 2024

Why you should care about the Third Pole and its crucial role as a global water resource

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum