Nature and Biodiversity

Tree pulp and ocean plastic: how shoemakers are reducing their environmental footprint 

One Silicon Valley start-up is making shoes from eucalyptus tree pulp. Image: Rafael Mota/Unsplash

Briony Harris
Senior Writer, Formative Content
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Nature and Biodiversity?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Retail, Consumer Goods and Lifestyle is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Retail, Consumer Goods and Lifestyle

The Silicon Valley start-up Allbirds is making its name by making shoes out of eco-friendly materials.

After the success of its woollen shoes, the company has developed a new textile by spinning eucalyptus tree pulp into a fiber and then knitting it into a mesh fabric. The insoles of the newly-launched skipper shoes are made from castor bean oil, the laces from 100% recycled polyester and even the eyelets are made from a bio-based plastic.

While many people have never stopped to think about the green credentials of a pair of shoes, the scale of global sneaker sales means improved industry practices could have a significant impact on the environment.

The global sneaker market is valued at $62bn and is expected to reach $90bn by the end of 2022. And Nike, for example, typically sells 25 pairs of sneakers every second.

Meanwhile, creating a typical pair of running shoes generates 13.6kg of carbon dioxide emissions, according to one study by MIT. This is equivalent to keeping a 100-watt light bulb on for one week.

Consumers often don’t think about the green credentials of a pair of shoes. Image: Allbirds

Interestingly, most of those emissions come from the manufacturing process rather than from sourcing and using the raw materials.

The MIT researchers found that more than two-thirds of a running shoe’s carbon impact occurs during manufacturing, especially as most shoes are made in China where coal is the dominant source of electricity.

The importance of the manufacturing process has not been overlooked by Allbirds. “Our tree fibers are sourced from South African farms that minimize fertilizer and rely on rainfall, not irrigation,” the company writes. “Compared to traditional materials like cotton, it uses 95% less water and cuts our carbon footprint in half.” In addition, the sourcing of materials complies with strict standards to protect forests and the animals and people who depend on them.

Many traditional sneaker makers such as Nike and Adidas are also working hard to improve the environmental credentials of their shoes.

The rise in plastics production has resulted in polluted oceans Image: The New Plastics Economy Report

Nike has created a new material called Flyleather by combining waste leather cast-offs with synthetics. Nike Flyleather claims to reduce water use by 90% and has an 80% smaller carbon footprint than traditional leather manufacturing.

And Adidas has sold more than one million pairs of shoes that are 95% made from plastic debris found in the ocean.

Adidas uses marine waste collected from the Maldives, with an average of 11 plastic bottles used per pair, with the plastic turned into laces, heel webbing and lining.

Adidas has tapped into the increasing concern about the amount of plastic waste in the oceans.

Plastics production has surged over the past 50 years, from 15 million tonnes in 1964 to 311 million tonnes in 2014. And it is expected to double again over the next 20 years, according to The New Plastics Economy Report.

Much of this plastic ends up in the oceans, which are expected to contain more plastics than fish by weight by 2050, unless the world makes significant changes now.

And the sneakers we choose to buy could be just one way of starting to reverse that trend.

Have you read?
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

5 ways sustainable forestry can support climate action, development and biodiversity

Charlotte Kaiser

April 23, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum