China

Period poverty: why Periods shouldn’t be a financial burden and how one retailer is helping?

International Women’s Day: Solutions for period poverty from one retailer.

International Women’s Day: Solutions for period poverty from one retailer. Image: Photo by Annika Gordon on Unsplash

Ella Kidron
Senior Manager, Global Corporate Affairs, JD.com
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on China?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how China is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

China

  • Period poverty: the World Bank estimates that 500 million women and girls globally lack access to adequate facilities for menstrual hygiene management.
  • Even for women who do not experience period poverty, high-quality feminine hygiene products often also come with a high sticker price. The gross margin on feminine hygiene products can be as high as 70%.
  • China's JD.com hopes to use its supply-chain strength to tackle the problem and will launch a long-term programme to donate feminine hygiene products to girls in remote areas.

The average woman spends seven years of her life on her period. As women are hitting puberty earlier and earlier, due to an increase in obesity, chemical exposure and other factors, this number is only rising.

This also means that the economic burden associated with periods are impacting women at a younger age, increasing the total cost over their lifetime and compounding the growing global issue of “period poverty”— a term that broadly refers to a lack of access to sanitary products, menstrual hygiene education, toilets, handwashing and/or waste management.

Period poverty statistics

The World Bank estimates that 500 million women and girls globally lack access to adequate facilities for menstrual hygiene management. Research from Plan International UK reveals that three in 10 girls and women aged 14-21 have had issues either affording or accessing feminine hygiene products during the COVID-19 lockdown, and that over 54% of them have resorted to toilet paper as an alternative. Cultural stigmas around periods also exacerbates these trends.

Have you read?

Recent moves to address period poverty around the world are encouraging, such as New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s pledge to provide menstrual products to students in the country for the next three years; Scotland’s announcement last November that it would make period products available for all who need them; and Britain’s promise to repeal the “tampon tax”, which classifies sanitary products as non-essential, luxury items.

In the US, the documentary Period. End of Sentence., which was the result of California high-school students who came together to address period poverty in rural India, won an Academy Award for a short documentary in 2019. In China, grassroots campaign Stand by Her is aiming to increase access and reduce stigma surrounding menstruation while increasing education for students.

Even for women who do not experience period poverty, high-quality feminine hygiene products often also come with a high sticker price. The gross margin on feminine hygiene products can be as high as 70%, while the tissue industry, which has a similar supply chain, has an average gross margin of around 30%.

Period poverty: What are the costs?

Seemingly every year, undoubtedly the result of significant R&D by top brands, new campaigns and new concepts surrounding feminine hygiene products emerge – pads with luxurious super-absorbent foam, pearl-like plastic tampon applicators, and more – giving women more options and flexibility around their periods. Environmentally friendly options are also mushrooming in the market – period underwear (US $23) and reusable cotton pads (US $30). All of this is well and good, but women also need more no-frills, affordable options that they can trust. This is where retailers can play an important role.

The primary reason for period poverty is that feminine hygiene products come with a high sticker price.
The primary reason for period poverty is that feminine hygiene products come with a high sticker price. Image: Rewire News

Take China as an example. Low-cost feminine hygiene products available in the Chinese market vary widely in quality. This poses a threat to consumers, especially those in lower-tier markets (defined as tier 3-6 cities). It is not uncommon to find copycat versions of name brands proliferating on poorly managed online marketplaces, or unbranded packages of pads sold in bulk with little transparency as to where they came from. And customers are not shy about questioning the quality of these products in their reviews.

Period poverty is not just for the poor or middle-class populations. As for the branded products – many are more expensive than necessary. Research from Zhongtai Securities finds that as the price is increased layer by layer, the final price of sanitary napkins can as much as triple. Cost reduction doesn’t have to be at the price of high quality.

JD.com hopes to use its supply-chain strength to help with this effort with a social e-commerce platform, Jingxi, that will work with the industrial belt of Quanzhou, a prefecture-level port city in southern Fujian province, to bring an affordable, high-quality sanitary pad option to the market.

Discover

What's the World Economic Forum doing about the gender gap?

The move also serves to support the Quanzhou industrial belt’s more traditional players to get acquainted with e-commerce, providing them additional growth channels. This is particularly helpful as many enterprises have turned towards the domestic market under COVID-19 export pressures.

On 8 March, this International Women’s Day, JD will also launch a long-term programme to donate sanitary napkins to girls in remote areas, beginning with working with Chinese Social Welfare Foundation’s Aixiaoya Fund (中国社会福利基金会爱小丫基金) to donate sanitary napkins to girls at Gansu Mountain Middle School.

The bottom line is that feminine hygiene products should not break the bank, and responsible supply-chain actors need to facilitate the availability of high-quality, affordable products to end period poverty. Period.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
ChinaGender Inequality
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Davos 2024: Special Address by H.E. Li Qiang, Premier of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China

January 17, 2024

Liming Chen

January 14, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum