Where would reasoning AI leave human intelligence?

"Reasoning AI" will complement human intelligence, amplifying productivity and enabling breakthroughs in complex problem-solving. Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto
- Advancements in AI are pushing towards integrating some elements of human reasoning into the process.
- This "reasoning AI" will complement human intelligence, amplifying productivity and enabling breakthroughs in complex problem-solving.
- As reasoning AI evolves, policymakers, industry leaders and technologists must establish robust control frameworks that ensure AI developments align with human values and societal goals.
While the promise of a "reasoning AI" is becoming more and more prevalent, the role of human intelligence may be transformed for better outcomes. From the simple chatbots of the first generation to today’s semi-autonomous AI agents, we see a shift towards systems that can handle complex tasks by merging generative capabilities with action-oriented functions. Despite these advancements, AI agents still face significant limitations, particularly in context understanding and complex reasoning.
This raises a crucial question: In a future where machines are capable of independent thought and action, what role should human intelligence play?
From mimicry to mastery: the journey to reasoning AI
Before jumping to the conclusion that our intelligence has created a tool that made it irrelevant, we must first take a step back and ask: how intelligent is AI? Interestingly, our current AI models — despite their impressive capabilities — possess little actual intelligence in the way we think of the term. At their core, AI systems are statistical and mathematical models. They operate by analyzing massive datasets, identifying patterns and using these patterns to predict, infer or generate outputs in response to user prompts.
This approach has allowed AI to achieve remarkable feats, particularly in mimicking human-like behaviour. Whether generating text, recognizing images or playing games at a superhuman level, AI has excelled at tasks that create the illusion of understanding. Yet, these systems lack any genuine comprehension of their environment or context. For instance, advanced natural language processing (NLP) systems, despite their sophistication, often misinterpret nuances like idioms or sarcasm.
This limitation becomes most apparent in the face of scenarios that fall outside the datasets on which these models were trained. Without a true understanding of the world in all its nuances and the absence of human-like common sense, AI systems struggle to adapt and reason in all nuances like humans can or make reliable decisions when faced with the unknown.
Until now, the prevailing strategy for improving AI has been to scale up: feeding models ever-larger datasets and increasing their complexity to capture more aspects of human behaviour. While this has yielded impressive advancements, it is also reaching its limits. As these systems grow larger, they become increasingly resource-intensive, brittle and dependent on the quality of their training data. The inability to reason or generalize beyond the learned patterns remains a fundamental barrier to intelligent systems that can match humans. Understanding these limitations is the first step towards transcending them, paving the way for AI systems that can better reason and interact with the world in a meaningful way.
Have you read?
The promise of reasoning AI
Advancements in AI are pushing towards integrating some elements of human reasoning. This includes causality – using AI to make decisions and predictions based on cause-and-effect relationships, rather than correlational relationships – and contextuality – which consists of evaluating data in its broader context, recognizing nuances, such as intent, contradictions or ambiguities, with the aim of enabling a higher level of relevance and precision in responses. These capabilities are critical for developing AI that can understand and respond to complex real-world scenarios beyond simple pattern recognition.
Nevertheless, we’ve seen AI and generative AI (GenAI) make remarkable progress in this field. GenAI is evolving to handle complex logic and decision-making, moving from simple content creation to more and more sophisticated problem-solving. Recent models introduced some inference capabilities and can now identify causal relationships between symptoms and diseases, rather than just matching symptoms to probabilities.
How is the World Economic Forum creating guardrails for Artificial Intelligence?
The vision of Artificial General Intelligence: reality or hype?
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) represents the pinnacle of AI aspirations: a system that can equal or go beyond human intelligence across diverse fields, without the need for extensive training for each of them. Sixty percent of top executives and VCs surveyed by the Capgemini Research Institute in the Top Tech Trends report believe this technology will reach maturity and become commercially viable by 2030. Yet, this vision remains largely aspirational, facing significant technical and ethical hurdles. Even the term AGI will probably evolve by then and will need to be redefined as we progress.
Current AI lacks causal reasoning, adaptability and long-term memory needed for generalization, as well as a safe and reliable behaviour, ensuring AI operates predictably in unpredictable scenarios. Transparency and visibility are also essential to avoid trust and accountability challenges. On a broader societal scale, risks include large-scale job displacement, decision-making authority and amplified societal inequalities.
AGI remains speculative; progress is far from achieving multi-domain intelligence. The focus should be on improving the collaborative outcomes of humans and AI, addressing complex challenges like ethical safeguards and contextual understanding, while avoiding exaggerated claims.
The evolving role of human intelligence in the age of AI
AI is an augmenter, but not a replacement. Humans will not become irrelevant, as human intelligence and capabilities are far more complex than just machine reasoning. Our intelligence is, after all, based on brain capabilities that are the result of millions of years of evolution. Our human reasoning capabilities are influenced by many factors, such as emotions or hormones. Even the learning process of babies is still something we struggle to fully understand and still cannot replicate.
Therefore, as we evolve together with machine capabilities, human roles will shift as AI becomes more capable of performing tasks independently. Reasoning AI will complement human intelligence, amplifying productivity and enabling breakthroughs in complex problem-solving.
There is a potential for human roles to focus more on strategic oversight, ethics, creativity or interpersonal relationships and to enhance their decision-making with AI, rather than being replaced by it. AI will provide insights and analysis, but humans will contextualize and apply them in decision-making and actions, using all the nuances and subtilities of human actions and behaviours. Humans will continue to define goals, set strategies and innovate beyond the capabilities of AI.
As reasoning AI continues to evolve, it is imperative for policymakers, industry leaders and technologists to collaboratively establish robust control frameworks that ensure AI developments are in alignment with human values and societal goals. This collaboration is crucial to guarantee that the benefits of AI are distributed equitably across society.
As decision-makers and the AI ecosystem will gather in Paris in a few weeks at the Paris AI Summit, it is imperative to advocate for policies that promote safe AI development. Such measures will not replace, but enhance, human roles by enabling humans to focus on what they do best - strategic oversight, ethics, creative problem-solving and interpersonal relationships to name just a few.
Ultimately, it is our responsibility and role as humans to ensure AI's potential and all related technological advancements are harnessed to build the right future for everyone.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Stay up to date:
Artificial Intelligence
Related topics:
Forum Stories newsletter
Bringing you weekly curated insights and analysis on the global issues that matter.
More on Fourth Industrial RevolutionSee all
Mark Esposito and Eduardo Araral
February 7, 2025