Future of the Environment

Most fish consumers support a ban on fishing endangered species, poll finds

A school of barracuda swims off the Malaysian island of Sipadan in Celebes Sea, east of Borneo, December 7, 2007.    REUTERS/David Loh   (MALAYSIA) - RTR1X2SS

Support was strongest in Latin America Image: REUTERS/David Loh

Joe Myers
Writer, Forum Agenda
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Future of the Environment?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of the Environment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Future of the Environment

  • 77% of adults who buy seafood regularly support a ban on the fishing of endangered species
  • 73% support an end to government subsidies that lead to overfishing or illegal fishing
  • Sir David Attenborough has called for an end to harmful fishing subsidies

A new global survery has found significant public support for a ban on the fishing of endangered species.

The survey, commissioned by the World Economic Forum and conducted by Ipsos, found that more than three-quarters (77%) of adults who regularly buy seafood support a ban.

A similar number also support an end to government subsidies that lead to overfishing or illegal fishing (73%).

Have you read?
The data
Bar chart shows attitudes in various countries.
Most countries' populations support a ban on fishing endangered species.
Attitudes to subsidies.
Most people would support a ban on harmful subsidies.

There was also wide support for banning shops and restaurants from selling endangered species of fish - 77%.

Discover

What's the World Economic Forum doing about the ocean?

A net gain

A third of the world's fish is harvested at biologically unsustainable levels.

Combine this with the millions of people who rely on seafood for their livelihoods and food security and the extent of the problem becomes clear.

subsidies by country
Funding over-fishing.

It's not only the public who support tackling the problem.

Last month, Sir David Attenborough called for an end to harmful fishing subsidies in a video created by the Friends of Ocean Action, the World Economic Forum and the WWF.

Loading...

But, the good news is that 2017 research from the World Bank found that 'fishing less, but better', could generate an additional $83 billion every year for the industry.

Loading...
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Future of the EnvironmentOceanAgriculture, Food and Beverage
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Why protecting the ocean floor matters for climate change

William Austin

April 17, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum