Forum Institutional

Emerging Asia faces a post-COVID inequality trap. Here's how to avoid it

Emerging Asia must act now to ensure an equitable recovery from the pandemic

Emerging Asia must act now to ensure an equitable recovery from the pandemic Image: Unsplash/Florian Wehde

Jean-Pascal Duvieusart
Member of the Board; Chief Executive Officer, Home Credit, PPF A.S.
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Forum Institutional?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how COVID-19 is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Davos Agenda

This article is part of: World Economic Forum Annual Meeting

Listen to the article

  • Emerging Asia is in danger of falling into an inequality trap as it recovers from the pandemic.
  • The region's poorest have been hit hardest by a reduction in their incomes and a lack of access to credit.
  • Here are 3 ways authorities can restore some balance.

There are no elements of the global economy that have escaped the impact of the recent pandemic. From central bank chiefs to prudent individual savers, all of us have been subject to the forces of financial change.

The looming inequality trap over Emerging Asia

‘Emerging Asia’ (defined by the IMF as comprising China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Viet Nam) is in danger of falling into an inequality trap for the following three reasons:

1. Financially disadvantaged people have been heavily affected by the pandemic.

2. Those people worst hit by the crisis now have reduced access to credit .

3. As a result, they are being forced to use unregulated vendors.

These three factors will be a concern to legislators and governments across Emerging Asia, as many economies begin to look beyond the pandemic.

The uneven impact of the global health crisis on Emerging Asia has challenged real disposable incomes and hit the region’s poorest the hardest. In South East Asia specifically, The Asian Development Bank estimates that the pandemic has pushed 4.7 million people into poverty and has destroyed over 9 million jobs.

The lack of access for poorer income households to more formal credit lines is highlighted by a recent Economist Impact report analysing COVID-19’s impact on personal finance in Asia. It shows that the countries experiencing the largest increases in household debt in 2020 were all high-income economies, with the exception of China (which has a rapidly-growing mortgage sector).

A separate OECD study of ASEAN countries revealed that half of the households that suffered a negative income shock resorted to drawing down on their savings, while more than a third deferred payments and debt repayments and a similar proportion sought government aid. This dramatic shift will have far-reaching consequences for the region’s poorest, many of whom are now having to confront the fact that they cannot access credit like before.

The negative income shock on ASEAN and Emerging Asia households have far-reaching consequences.
The negative income shock on ASEAN and Emerging Asia households have far-reaching consequences. Image: ADB Institute

In this new scenario, financially squeezed consumers are often left with little choice but to seek financial relief from black-market sources. These traditionally offline operators offer predominantly unregulated, unsecured, and unfavourable financial solutions to severe debt problems. The increasing popularity of 'buy now pay later' products also present a hazard, with many of these products targeting younger, less financially savvy consumers.

Ensuring even recovery for Emerging Asia and ASEAN

If an economy is represented as a human body, the money flowing through that economy is its blood. Put simply, people need access to money if an economy is to remain healthy. In many cases across Emerging Asia, the economic patient is sick – and governments and regulators need to act quickly.

In many cases they have sprung into action, delivering elevated levels of public spending to cushion some citizens from negative pandemic-related impacts. Countries have rolled out large-scale fiscal and monetary packages. These measures are designed to stimulate the economy, ensure a minimum level of income security and protect businesses, especially SMEs.

Have you read?

The scale of the effort is outlined by data from Singapore’s ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. It shows that ASEAN countries had authorised pandemic stimulus packages of $730 billion at the height of the pandemic in 2021. That is the equivalent of 7.7% of the region’s GDP. But what else can authorities do to ensure a less uneven recovery and ensure protection is offered to those who need it? Here are three options.

1. Promote digital adoption: The pandemic has necessitated the use of digital tools and platforms as a means to resolve health challenges. The democratisation of information and services would further open up access to resources such as financial services. A McKinsey paper on the opportunity for Asia to harness technology for growth suggests that the region (including Emerging Asia) has taken a lead in social commerce – the process of selling products directly via social media and the COVID-19 pandemic has simply accelerated adoption.

2. Champion the importance of financial literacy: Providing individuals with the tools to understand and responsibly use financial services is an important part of any response to the global health crisis. In a paper written on financial literacy in Indonesia for the Asian Development Bank, the three academic authors concluded: “A key policy lesson from the study is that it is advisable for national and international efforts in poverty reduction to pay more attention to improving and enhancing an individual’s financial knowledge and skills.”

3. Create a level playing field: Regulators now have an opportunity to create an equitable environment that offers protection and transparency. Solid regulation is also a form of protection. For example, new market entrants should be subject to a common regulatory approach – shielding the most vulnerable consumers should be a post-pandemic priority.

There is little doubt that the global pandemic will have long-term impacts on populations in Emerging Asia. However, the crisis has presented new opportunities to embrace fresh approaches to healthcare delivery and access to financial services. The deep impact on the region’s poorest, the reduction in credit access to those communities and the threat of unregulated operators means we will need closer cooperation between the public and private sectors if we are to avoid deeper inequality post-pandemic.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Forum InstitutionalHealth and Healthcare SystemsGeographies in Depth
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

What to expect at the Special Meeting on Global Collaboration, Growth and Energy for Development

Spencer Feingold and Gayle Markovitz

April 19, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum