Urban Transformation

Cities are sizing up the generative AI skyline. But first, they have to establish the ground rules

Tech-minded San Jose is already formulating policies on civic use of GenAI.

Tech-minded San Jose is already formulating policies on civic use of GenAI. Image: Unsplash/Andrii Ganzevych

Sara Al Hudaithy
Fellow, Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Saudi Arabia, World Economic Forum
Anu Devi
Lead, G20 Global Smart Cities Alliance, Urban Transformation, World Economic Forum
  • 96 out of 100 mayors and city staff have expressed an interest in exploring the possible applications of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), rather than actively implementing it.
  • This exploratory phase is an opportunity to understand the best use cases and risks of GenAI.
  • An initial landscape review shows that several cities in North America and Europe are establishing GenAI policies covering fundamental technology governance topics.

The use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technology – which involves using data, algorithms and machine learning to generate new content – is surging among individuals and businesses; governments are also entering the arena by integrating GenAI into their operations. The GenAI market is projected to expand to $255.8 billion by 2033, compared to $13.5 billion in 2023.

Have you read?

As cities worldwide recognize the technology’s potential, several of them are formulating policies to regulate its use. Their development represents a crucial step in navigating the opportunities and challenges presented by emerging technologies. From Dubai to California’s San Jose, cities are exploring AI and GenAI governance with a focus on ethical considerations, transparency and accountability. These overarching frameworks represent the initial phase in an ongoing effort to develop and refine GenAI policies and procedures, aimed at fostering responsible use of GenAI capabilities in public administration and services.

By establishing ethical frameworks before integrating GenAI into public services, Saudi Arabia aims to responsibly leverage AI for community benefit and align with its Vision 2030 goals of becoming a global AI leader. This aligns with people-centred smart city principles, ensuring technology enhances quality of life and inclusivity.

Basma AlBuharian, Managing Director, Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution Saudi Arabia

The current status of GenAI

Cities seem to be in the exploratory phase of adopting GenAI. In 2023, Bloomberg Philanthropies surveyed 100 mayors and city staff to gauge their views on the technology. City leaders worldwide expressed interest in utilizing it, with 69% of cities either exploring or testing GenAI capabilities.

These city officials are particularly interested in understanding how GenAI can help enhance citizen engagement, advance data-driven policy-making, optimize services and resource allocation, and streamline administrative processes and communication. In addition, they are interested in determining how GenAI can enhance city services and efficiency, especially in areas such as traffic and transportation, infrastructure, public safety, environmental issues, education and administrative tasks.

A rigorous approach to generative AI's diagnosis of need, procurement, integration and evaluation is necessary for municipal administrations across the world. This also is an emergent domain for cities to partner with the non-profit, philanthropic and corporate sectors.

Neil Britto, the Intersector Project, the Aspen Institute

However, there seems to be a gap between interest and implementation. While 96% of mayors are interested in the use of GenAI, many have not developed comprehensive policies related to it, and only 2% of cities are actively adopting the technology. Those cities adopting GenAI are designating GenAI leads, creating high-level guidelines and providing training for their staff.

An initial preliminary review of GenAI city policies by the G20 Global Smart Cities Alliance in early 2024 indicates that some cities, primarily from North America and Europe, are taking early steps to develop policies and guidelines for governance of the technology.

GenAI presents a transformative opportunity to enhance the quality of life in our communities by optimizing city services and fostering data-driven decision-making. It is crucial for cities to establish robust policies that ensure ethical and transparent use, while not hesitating to judiciously and purposefully advance positive community impact with this revolutionary technology.

Mike Lake, CEO, Leading Cities

Common principles among these guidelines include the prioritization of ethical considerations such as security, transparency, privacy and accountability. The guidelines emphasize the need for transparency in decision-making processes, responsible data use, and protection of individual rights. Moreover, there is a shared recognition of GenAI's potential impact on citizens and the importance of maintaining fairness, inclusivity and human oversight in the deployment of these technologies.

To share a few examples:

Seattle, Washington has a policy that aims to establish requirements that city departments must follow when procuring and utilizing software that falls under the definition of GenAI.

San Jose, California has a guideline setting baseline rules for users (such as staff, contractors and volunteers) while using GenAI for city work. In addition to usage of the technology being subject to the Public Record Act, the measure sets out principles for using GenAI, addresses copyright and content ownership, and requires users to cite AI when used and to understand the related risks.

• With concerns over the impact and use of GenAI, Boston, Massachusetts has an interim policy in place as a resource for employees when using such tools.

• Cities like Amsterdam and Helsinki have established registries to outline how algorithms are used in delivering services, while New York City has established laws requiring companies to disclose algorithms related to hiring.

The governance of GenAI by local government is relatively new – many of the ethical and responsible principles and practices being explored align with fundamental concerns related to technology governance.

Establishing responsible GenAI governance policies will be crucial in developing trusted products and services that can deliver the greatest value to society. The World Economic Forum’s AI Governance Alliance continues to lead on AI governance by fostering consensus on global best practices and ensuring technology governance contributes positively to societal well-being. Stakeholders can also refer to the AI procurement in the box tool to rethink how they acquire AI and make responsible purchasing decisions.

Beyond the GenAI hype

The exploration and adoption of GenAI by cities is still in its infancy, and its impact remains to be fully understood. Cities globally are facing numerous social, environmental and economic challenges. Technology, when used appropriately and when it is found to be the right and best available solution, can be a powerful tool for addressing them.

GenAI is an emerging force for empowerment of citizens and the workforce, and the more we understand collectively the greater the potential that’s unlocked. But to put it to work for us today, we must elevate our understanding above the early-stage fog of speculation, focus on solutions for transformational effectiveness and efficiencies, and meet the rigorous standards for security, accessibility and performance management our communities expect from government.

Justin Herman, Vice-President, Global Public Sector, ServiceNow

The potential of combining unbiased and large datasets with machine learning and other technological capabilities can bring significant benefits to society, governments and businesses. However, this potential can only be realized when risks and unintended consequences, both short- and long-term, are accounted for and addressed through governance frameworks designed to minimize harm. Additionally, finding cost-effective and practical use cases and learnings for cities is essential for successful adoption.

As shown by Gartner, it seems that GenAI is at the peak of the hype cycle and will take years before reaching the “plateau of productivity” where real adoption is likely to be observed. This presents opportunities to understand the technology’s potential in local government, thoroughly determining the barriers and risks early on, knowing when GenAI is and isn’t appropriate for a city challenge, and thinking about appropriate and agile solutions that can be sustainable over time and given complexities.

GenAI is peaking on the hype cycle, leading to uncertainty about its real-world applicability.
GenAI is peaking on the hype cycle, leading to uncertainty about its real-world applicability. Image: Gartner

Cities are already encountering several obstacles to determining the true potential of GenAI, including knowing where it can make a difference. Mayors and city staff are also identifying barriers to adoption of the technology, including a lack of technical expertise, policies and awareness, budgetary constraints, data privacy and security concerns, limited access to sufficient infrastructure, and a lack of use cases. These challenges underscore the necessity for comprehensive strategies to tackle the complexities and risks associated with integrating GenAI into city operations and services.

Looking ahead, the future of GenAI policies in cities lies in the establishment of comprehensive frameworks that balance innovation with ethical considerations. As cities continue to navigate the complexities of GenAI governance, it is crucial for policy-makers to engage in ongoing dialogue with experts, stakeholders and the public to ensure that GenAI policies reflect the values and needs of the communities they serve.

Discover

How is the World Economic Forum supporting the development of cities and communities globally?

Cities must prioritize the development of GenAI policies that address not only the technical aspects of its implementation, but also the ethical, legal and social ramifications of deploying such technology in an urban context. This involves fostering a culture of responsible use of GenAI, ensuring that systems are transparent, accountable and aligned with societal values. Cities should also focus on building technical expertise within their administrations and fostering partnerships with academia, industry and civil society.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Urban TransformationFourth Industrial Revolution
Share:
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Can climate tech save our cities?

Zachary Smith

December 6, 2024

How metals can help construct more sustainable cities around the world

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum