- Building nature into cities can support overall health and human well-being.
- Activities like dog walking, jogging, cycling, and community gardening are all supported by cities’ natural spaces.
- Lack of physical activity in the US results in $117 billion a year in related health care costs and leads to 3.2 million deaths globally every year.
- By building more green spaces, we can positively impact mental and physical health of residents.
The research shows how access to nature in cities increases physical activity, and therefore, overall health.
Lack of physical activity in the US results in $117 billion a year in related health care costs and leads to 3.2 million deaths globally every year. It may seem like an intuitive connection, but the new research closes an important gap in understanding how building nature into cities can support overall human well-being.
Have you read?
“Over the past year of shelter-in-place restrictions, we’ve learned how valuable and fulfilling it can be to spend time outdoors in nature, especially for city-dwellers,” says lead author Roy Remme, a postdoctoral researcher at the Stanford University’s Natural Capital Project at the time of research.
“We want to help city planners understand where green spaces might best support people’s health, so everyone can receive nature’s benefits.”
In cities, nature provides cooling shade to neighborhood streets, safe harbor for pollinators, and rainwater absorption to reduce flooding. It’s widely understood that physical activity improves human health, but how parks, lakes, trees, and other urban green spaces boost physical activity and overall well-being is an unsolved piece of the puzzle.
Nature has many health benefits
For the study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers combined decades of public health research with information on nature’s benefits to people in cities.
They considered how activities like dog walking, jogging, cycling, and community gardening are supported by cities’ natural spaces. They also factored in things like distance to urban greenery, feelings of safety, and accessibility to understand how those elements can alter the benefits of nature for different people. From tree-lined sidewalks to city parks and waterfronts, the team created a model framework to map out urban nature’s physical health benefits.
In Amsterdam, city planners are currently implementing a new green infrastructure plan. Using the city as a hypothetical case study, the researchers applied their framework to understand how Amsterdam’s plans to build or improve new parks might affect physical activity for everyone in the city. The researchers also looked at the effects on different sub-populations, like youth, the elderly, and low-income groups. This example illustrates how the city could invest in urban nature to have the greatest physical activity benefits for human health.
The research will ultimately serve as the basis for a new health model in Natural Capital Project software—free, open-source tools that map the many benefits nature provides people.
The software was recently used to inform an assessment of 775 European cities to understand the potential of nature-based solutions for addressing climate change. Eventually, the new health model software will be available to city planners, investors, and anyone else interested in new arguments and tools for targeting investments in nature in cities.
Nature’s contributions are multidimensional—they can support cognitive, emotional, and spiritual well-being, as well as physical health. Previous work from the Natural Capital Project has shown many of these connections, but the new research adds an important link to physical health that had been missing from the equation.
“Nature experience boosts memory, attention, and creativity as well as happiness, social engagement, and a sense of meaning in life,” says senior author Gretchen Daily, faculty director of the Stanford Natural Capital Project.
“It might not surprise us that nature stimulates physical activity, but the associated health benefits—from reducing cancer risks to promoting metabolic and other functioning—are really quite astonishing.”
What's the World Economic Forum doing about the future of cities?
Cities represent humanity's greatest achievements - and greatest challenges. From inequality to air pollution, poorly designed cities are feeling the strain as 68% of humanity is predicted to live in urban areas by 2050.
The World Economic Forum supports a number of projects designed to make cities cleaner, greener and more inclusive.
These include hosting the Global Future Council on Cities and Urbanization, which gathers bright ideas from around the world to inspire city leaders, and running the Future of Urban Development and Services initiative. The latter focuses on how themes such as the circular economy and the Fourth Industrial Revolution can be harnessed to create better cities. To shed light on the housing crisis, the Forum has produced the report Making Affordable Housing a Reality in Cities.
Where urban nature is missing
As our world becomes more urbanized and city-centric, the ability to easily access outdoor natural spaces becomes increasingly challenging, especially for overburdened communities.
Identifying where urban nature is missing in vulnerable or overburdened communities—then hen working to fill those gaps—could provide people with valuable new opportunities to improve their health. The researchers hope the new study will equip urban planners with a more complete understanding of the benefits nature can provide their communities.
“Our ultimate goal is to create more healthy, equitable, and sustainable cities,” says coauthor Anne Guerry, chief strategy officer at the Natural Capital Project. “This research is actionable—and gets us one big step closer.”
Additional coauthors are from Stanford; Leiden University; the University of Washington; RMIT University; Nanyang Technological University, the Chinese Academy of Sciences; Harvard Medical School, the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health; the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and Stockholm Resilience Centre; the City University of Hong Kong; Maastricht University; Australian Catholic University; the University of Southern Denmark; Wageningen University; and the University of Exeter.
Funding for this research came, in part, from the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation, the Winslow Foundation, the LuEsther Mertz Charitable Trust, John Miller, and individual supporters of the Natural Capital Project.
Source: Stanford University